Growing With Purpose: A GIS Model for Future GUTS Installations by Justin Myers

Growing With Purpose is the Directed Research project I completed while at the University of Toledo.

Downloads

Contents

Abstract

Native plant gardens on the University of Toledo campus not only provide essential habitat for wildlife and pollinators but also provide ecological benefits while simultaneously offering significant aesthetic value. Historically however, garden placement has lacked a data-driven approach regarding visibility and engagement. This study utilizes Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to identify optimal locations for future GUTS (Greening UToledo through Service) installations by modeling foot traffic around campus. Since real-time pedestrian data was unavailable, building capacity was used as a proxy for foot traffic. Weighted values were applied to high-traffic areas such as parking lots, sports facilities, and buildings such as the Student Union & Carlson Library, while existing gardens were negatively weighted to prioritize underserved areas. The building capacity data provided by the College of Natural Sciences and Mathematics revealed three primary hotspot areas for potential development: Honors Village/Tucker Hall, Ritter/Stranahan, and McComas Village. These preliminary results demonstrate that a weighted GIS model can successfully identify high-impact locations, providing a framework that can be used for future GUTS gardens.

Introduction

Greening UToledo through Service (GUTS) aims to create native landscapes around the University of Toledo campus, increasing biodiversity and sustainability, through the help of undergraduate service learning volunteers. However, previous methods of determining placement of these installations were based on instinct rather than a data-driven approach. The purpose of this research is to use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to identify new garden locations with the highest community impact. By using building capacity as a proxy for human density and applying a negative weight to existing gardens, this model prioritizes areas around campus that lack these native installations.

Methods

To find the best locations for new gardens, a spatial analysis was performed in ArcGIS Pro using the University of Toledo campus data. Because direct data on foot traffic was unavailable, building capacity was used as a proxy to estimate human density.

The model was built using the following logic:

  • • Parking Lots: Weighted on a 1–5 scale based on the physical size of the lot.
  • • Buildings without Capacity: For structures missing data, an estimated value between 0 and 5 was assigned.
  • • Existing Gardens: To prevent new gardens from being clustered in the same areas, current garden locations were given a weight between -5 and 5 based on their distance from buildings, parking lots, and sports facilities.
  • • Intelligent Averaging: All factors were combined into an Average_Weight field that was scaled 1–5. To account for missing building data, an “intelligent average” function was utilized to calculate priority based only on available valid inputs, preventing null values from skewing the results.

This data was then visualized as a Heat Map to identify the highest priority zones for native installations.

Conclusion

This research shows how GIS can be used to make sure new installations are placed where they are actually needed on the University of Toledo campus. Instead of just picking subjective spots, the model uses building and parking data to find the areas with the most people and the fewest existing native plants. By following this map, GUTS can be more efficient with its volunteers and resources. These results provide a clear plan for where to plant next to make the campus more biodiverse and make sure the student body actually sees and enjoys the new green spaces.

Figures & Graphs

Below are the figures and graphs produced from this research. Clicking any image will make it larger.

Figure 1:

Overview of entire campus. The main hotspots can be seen in more detail below.

Figure 2:

Heatmap of the Honors Academic Village / Tucker Hall area on the NW end of campus.

Figure 3:

Heatmap of the Ritter / Stranahan area on the NE end of campus.

Figure 4:

Heatmap of the McComas Village / Ottawa House area on the SW end of campus. This area shows the highest priority for a future GUTS installation.

Figure 5:

(Not included on poster)

Heatmap of Paul Hotmer Field and John F. Savage Arena.

Figure 6:

(Not included on poster)

Heatmap of Engineering.

Figure 7:

(Not included on poster)

Average Weights by Building. Each building on campus with its corresponding weight. The scale for buildings is -5-5 and is determined by averaging the distance to the closest garden and the capacity of the building.

Figure 8:

(Not included on poster)

Average Weights by Parking Lot. Each parking lot on campus with its corresponding weight. The scale for parking lots is -5-5 and is determined by averaging the distance to the closest garden and the size of the lot.

Figure 9:

(Not included on poster)

Average Weights by Sports Facility. Each sports facility on campus with its corresponding weight. The scale for sports facilities is -5-5 and is determined by averaging the distance to the closest garden and the weight manually applied.

Figure 10:

(Not included on poster)

Average Weights - Combined. Every building, parking lot, and sports facility on campus with its corresponding weight. The scale for all is -5-5.

Justin Myers | Growing With Purpose
keyboard_arrow_up